Different Types of Columbus Bail Bonds
Alternatives to Monetary Columbus Bail Bonds - Partly because of public perceptions of inequities in the use of bail, and perhaps even more because of severe jail overcrowding, a number of alternatives to monetary bail have been created. One of the most widely used alternatives is release on recognizance (ROR)--that is, a personal promise to appear at trial. Other measures include the following: Conditional release- Defendants promise to meet stated conditions that extend beyond simply promising to appear in court. Such conditions might include agreeing to maintain one's residence or employment status, remain in the jurisdiction, adhere to a curfew, report to a third party or designated release program, or participate in a drug or alcohol treatment program.
Unsecured bail- No payment is required at the time of release. However, if the defendant fails to appear at required hearings, he or she becomes liable to pay the full amount. Properly bail- The defendant may post evidence of real property, such as a car title, as an alternative to paying cash bail. Court deposit bail- The defendant may deposit a certain percentage of the bail amount with the court (usually 10 to 15 percent). When the defendant fulfills his or her appearance requirements, the deposit is returned. Some courts subtract a small administrative fee from this deposit." The successful use of these alternatives to the traditional posting of monetary bail gave support for the passage of the Bail Reform Act of 1966. This legislation presumed that defendants were to be considered for ROR or conditional release unless the prosecution could show strong evidence supporting the need for monetary bail. In an attempt to reduce the apparent race, ethnicity, and class bias in pretrial release, bail guidelines were developed for use in a number of courts. Using a two-dimensional grid that plots the severity of the offense against the defendant's personal characteristics (such as his or her courtroom demeanor, any physical or mental health concerns, other current or outstanding warrants, and the possibility of a mandatory sentence in the current case), the court determines whether the defendant should receive ROR or conditional release or pay money bail.
Another concern--the need to protect society from the additional commission of crimes by dangerous offenders awaiting trial--led the U.S. Congress to pass the Bail Reform Act of 1984-- This legislation extended the opportunity for ROR for suspects in many federal cases by mandating that defendants should not be kept in custody simply because they could not afford money columbus bail bonds. At the same time, it provided for the preventive detention of defendants who are charged with particularly serious crimes and thus are perceived to be high risks for committing further crimes or absconding before trial. Temporary preventive detention without bail is permitted if a defendant is on pretrial release for another offense, is on probation, is out on parole, or if the judicial officer finds that no conditions or combination of conditions will reasonably ensure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community. The burden of rebuttal is forced on the defendant; that is, the defendant must convince the court that he or she is not a risk.
Unsecured bail- No payment is required at the time of release. However, if the defendant fails to appear at required hearings, he or she becomes liable to pay the full amount. Properly bail- The defendant may post evidence of real property, such as a car title, as an alternative to paying cash bail. Court deposit bail- The defendant may deposit a certain percentage of the bail amount with the court (usually 10 to 15 percent). When the defendant fulfills his or her appearance requirements, the deposit is returned. Some courts subtract a small administrative fee from this deposit." The successful use of these alternatives to the traditional posting of monetary bail gave support for the passage of the Bail Reform Act of 1966. This legislation presumed that defendants were to be considered for ROR or conditional release unless the prosecution could show strong evidence supporting the need for monetary bail. In an attempt to reduce the apparent race, ethnicity, and class bias in pretrial release, bail guidelines were developed for use in a number of courts. Using a two-dimensional grid that plots the severity of the offense against the defendant's personal characteristics (such as his or her courtroom demeanor, any physical or mental health concerns, other current or outstanding warrants, and the possibility of a mandatory sentence in the current case), the court determines whether the defendant should receive ROR or conditional release or pay money bail.
Another concern--the need to protect society from the additional commission of crimes by dangerous offenders awaiting trial--led the U.S. Congress to pass the Bail Reform Act of 1984-- This legislation extended the opportunity for ROR for suspects in many federal cases by mandating that defendants should not be kept in custody simply because they could not afford money columbus bail bonds. At the same time, it provided for the preventive detention of defendants who are charged with particularly serious crimes and thus are perceived to be high risks for committing further crimes or absconding before trial. Temporary preventive detention without bail is permitted if a defendant is on pretrial release for another offense, is on probation, is out on parole, or if the judicial officer finds that no conditions or combination of conditions will reasonably ensure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community. The burden of rebuttal is forced on the defendant; that is, the defendant must convince the court that he or she is not a risk.
Source...