Wedding Videography Vs. Photography
Wedding will be the special occasion in one's life. As soon as the wedding preparation begins, the first thing that comes to our mind is the photography and videography. Photography is conducted even during the olden days. This is the only source in which anyone can support the best memories of their life.
Photography is among the most required source than videography. Lots of people could even avoid videography but select photography because of budget. Photography is the best way people used and still are using it in order to preserve the special day events but videography is used in recent times only.
Videography plays a vital role in the recent time weddings. Because of advancement in modern technologies in digital videos, editing videos, digital music etc videography is reported to be the ideal documentation of weddings events.
Merits on Wedding Videography vs. Photography:
* Wedding vows: Wedding vows in our own voice about the big day can just be recorded through videography. Whereas in photography, only stills could be taken however, not the best voice.
* Ceremony: Though in photography, only stills is often adopted the wedding events but on videography, whole ceremony is often viewed using the audio, even after a great deal of the wedding ceremony.
* Wedding dance: First wedding dance with the partner can be viewed back after many years only through videography but photography just take snaps of the dance which does not brings back our full dancing memory.
* Wedding toasts: wedding toasts offered by our friends, relatives on their real voice on our wedding is usually viewed back and can be heard even when some time only in videography. Photography will not give that effects and it will just afford the shots adopted that event.
* Wedding humor: Many humorous events happens in the wedding event throughout the ceremony and while giving speech, vows, etc mistakes happens and yes it is really a great humor which should not be enjoyed only by viewing it, it will probably be best when you are able view and tune in to it even after many years. This pleasure could be given only by videography.
* Convenient to carry: Though videography is definitely more enjoyable, it can't be observed by all. To examine videography it needs compulsory use of DVDplayers and TV, computer etc is essential. Not every one can afford to these compulsory things and thus many will never be interested to see it. Where as photography is an easy thing to bring. It can not require any players or computers. Anybody can look at shots consumed in a wedding event.
* Internet sharing: From the recent times, internet plays a vital role. Many people have been sharing photos on the net. You can actually look at shots online but where as videos may also be uploaded nevertheless it requires huge the perfect time to download and also the full version cannot be uploaded. But photos could be uploaded up to you want.
Therefore photography and videography both plays a vital role in this modern generation and though both photography and videography have their own merits and demerits but acts as a best source to recollect the wedding memories or any other important aspect that happened in our life.
Photography is among the most required source than videography. Lots of people could even avoid videography but select photography because of budget. Photography is the best way people used and still are using it in order to preserve the special day events but videography is used in recent times only.
Videography plays a vital role in the recent time weddings. Because of advancement in modern technologies in digital videos, editing videos, digital music etc videography is reported to be the ideal documentation of weddings events.
Merits on Wedding Videography vs. Photography:
* Wedding vows: Wedding vows in our own voice about the big day can just be recorded through videography. Whereas in photography, only stills could be taken however, not the best voice.
* Ceremony: Though in photography, only stills is often adopted the wedding events but on videography, whole ceremony is often viewed using the audio, even after a great deal of the wedding ceremony.
* Wedding dance: First wedding dance with the partner can be viewed back after many years only through videography but photography just take snaps of the dance which does not brings back our full dancing memory.
* Wedding toasts: wedding toasts offered by our friends, relatives on their real voice on our wedding is usually viewed back and can be heard even when some time only in videography. Photography will not give that effects and it will just afford the shots adopted that event.
* Wedding humor: Many humorous events happens in the wedding event throughout the ceremony and while giving speech, vows, etc mistakes happens and yes it is really a great humor which should not be enjoyed only by viewing it, it will probably be best when you are able view and tune in to it even after many years. This pleasure could be given only by videography.
* Convenient to carry: Though videography is definitely more enjoyable, it can't be observed by all. To examine videography it needs compulsory use of DVDplayers and TV, computer etc is essential. Not every one can afford to these compulsory things and thus many will never be interested to see it. Where as photography is an easy thing to bring. It can not require any players or computers. Anybody can look at shots consumed in a wedding event.
* Internet sharing: From the recent times, internet plays a vital role. Many people have been sharing photos on the net. You can actually look at shots online but where as videos may also be uploaded nevertheless it requires huge the perfect time to download and also the full version cannot be uploaded. But photos could be uploaded up to you want.
Therefore photography and videography both plays a vital role in this modern generation and though both photography and videography have their own merits and demerits but acts as a best source to recollect the wedding memories or any other important aspect that happened in our life.
Source...