It is clear that in these last primaries the Clinton's are going to use the strategy of "scorched earth!" This is a military strategy that basically to bomb anything and everything and leave nothing alive whatever the cost.
At the same time the Clinton's have claimed to be the victims of negative media biased and said Obama gets a "free pass!" Excuses on why the "Clinton's" campaign mistakes appears to be the real strategy that has been pushed on the American electorate.
In the same instance, Clinton's campaign also stress that Obama doesn't have the political experience to be the president of the United States of America.
No matter what the Clinton's strategy might be at this point in the nomination process it is clear that every political trick in the playbook to derail Obama's momentum to the Democratic nomination.
Hillary two weeks ago said "Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania are her firewalls.
" In the same breath they claimed that Obama has been treated like "velvet gloves!" If Obama had lost eleven straight states in a row would the press still give him any chance to win the Democratic nomination? The political savvy of the Clinton's is very clever playing the victim and the bully role at the same time.
Senator Clinton uses her natural advantages to her favor by raising up her gender and her years of Washington D.
C experience.
One question to ask is the mud slinging really helping the Democrats or the Republicans? Let's face reality, we as citizens of America enjoy gladiator fights to the death.
We have arenas all over our land where we go out for entertainment and watch two human beings male and female beat each other to a pulp.
Usually men and women don't fight each other in professional fights unless in a domestic violence scenario.
In this Democratic nomination process we have the best of both worlds a black man fighting a white woman for the right to represent the democrats for the presidential nomination.
Hillary has always been the pre-coronated nominee and the democratic nomination was just a mere formality to become the first women U.
S president.
Barak on the other hand was always a long shot to win the democratic nomination, given the fact that no black candidate male or female has run a successful campaign to become eligible to run for president.
It appears to me for the rest of the way Hillary is going to be like the mythical characterization of the pelage mask that is half side with a smile but the other half a frown.
Really, Senator Clinton has to go negative on Obama because she has squandered her opportunities to become the unchallenged front-runner.
Obama's challenge is to not be pressured by the media, pun dents and Hillary's trap to become negative with her.
He needs to stay his message of change and turning the chapter on the political dynasties of the Clinton's and the Bush's.
Most of the critics so far want Obama to get more negative and attack Hillary but with his lead in most states won plus more pledged delegates, with a possibility of the popular vote lead, what's so wrong? Here's my advice to Obama, "if it ain'tbroke don't fix it!"