The state of New York is trying to ban e cigs outright with a new bill in front of the state Assembly Health and wellbeing Committee. Linda Rosenthal, an area Ny politician wants to prohibit the devices right up until these are much more thoroughly investigated and controlled. Sad to say, this progress advises Rosenthal hasn't paid awareness of the electronic cigarette news string thus I'll essential her in on a little "secret":

A federal government judge asserted that e-cig companies aren't selling the instruments as "smoking cessation tools," and therefore, they can't be controlled by the actual Food and drug administration. In the mind of the united states federal government at this point in time, electronic cigarettes aren't any diverse from typical cigarettes…just a different way to have that nicotine fix (even though possibly a hell of a much more securely).

Primary Reasons people want to ban e-cigs-

* Just a different form of addiction -- no unlike tobacco
* They are not regulated by Food and Drug Administration
* Offer flavors that could be appealing to kids like fruit flavors
* Still contain Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines like cigarettes
* They have not undergone accurate enough testing
* Simple for minors to get from the internet
* Unregulated for quality
* Some ingredients are known carginogens

So, Ms. Rosenthal, the united states federal government perceives e cigarettes as merely alternatives to normal smoking cigarettes. For this reason, you may well be waiting around quite a while for the Fda to operate additional checks about the equipment.

I'm curious as to why Ms. Rosenthal isn't forcing regarding screening and further legislation on regular tobacco cigarettes if they're clearly much more risky in comparison with electronic cigarettes.

Points against banning e-cigs -

* Kids can buy tobacco online also
* Adults may want fruity flavors.We haven't banned wine coolers or Hooka.
* Cigarettes are unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, so why should E-cigs?

This is amazing to me that people in politics are generally battling so difficult - no doubt simply to make sure you their particular ingredients and get re-elected - to ban e cigarettes when they are quite clearly a more secure alternative to tobacco smoking cigarettes. Men and women are most often against anything that is even remotely connected to using tobacco or maybe smoking, even if it's a product which is clearly a better option to standard smoking. Ms. Rosenthal's time frame will be far better used encouraging individuals to switch to e-cigs with the ultimate aim of quitting smoking completely. Any cigarette smoker understands just how addictive cigarette smoking will be, and seeking to give up cold turkey is tough. If there's a possibility to assist those that smoke move to a less hazardous choice, shouldn't all of us always be promoting that as opposed to seeking to handicap them from the outset?